PA11 vs. PA12 in 3D Printing

Polyamide 11 (PA11) and Polyamide 12 (PA12) are among the most important materials in industrial 3D printing. While PA12 has been considered a proven standard for years, PA11 is increasingly used for demanding functional components due to its high toughness and flexibility. Both materials offer specific advantages that can be decisive depending on the application. A direct comparison helps identify the right material choice for functional components.

Material Properties Compared


Property Polyamide 11 (PA11) Polyamide 12 (PA12)
Flexibility ★★★★★ ★★★☆☆
Stiffness ★★★☆☆ ★★★★☆
Dimensional Accuracy ★★★★☆ ★★★★☆
Impact Strength ★★★★★ ★★★★☆

Rating from ★☆☆☆☆ (low) to ★★★★★ (very high)


Technical Data Compared


Property PA11 PA12
Tensile Strength approx. 45–50 MPa approx. 48–55 MPa
Elongation at Break approx. 30–50% approx. 15–25%
Tensile Modulus approx. 1300–1500 MPa approx. 1500–1700 MPa
Density ~1.03 g/cm³ ~1.01 g/cm³
Melting Point approx. 203 °C approx. 176 °C

*The values shown are typical reference values and may vary depending on the manufacturing process, part geometry and testing direction.

Applications

PA11 and PA12 in Use

PA11 and PA12 are among the most widely used plastics in industrial 3D printing. Both materials are used across numerous industries, including automotive, mechanical engineering and medical technology.

The choice of material primarily depends on whether tough, impact-resistant parts or stiff, dimensionally stable components are required.

While PA11 excels in flexible and impact-loaded applications, PA12 is often used for dimensionally stable technical components due to its higher stiffness. The higher stiffness of PA12 is also reflected in its material properties, particularly in the tensile modulus.

PA11: Clips and snap-fit connections, flexible or movable parts, components subjected to high impact and shock loads
PA12: Housings and brackets, dimensionally stable technical components, parts with increased requirements for stiffness and dimensional stability



PA11 or PA12 - Which Choice Is Right?

PA11

  • Ideal for tough, flexible and durable components
  • Suitable for clips and snap-fit connections
  • High elongation at break for resilient designs
  • Good performance under impact and shock loads
  • Bio-based material made from renewable resources

PA12

  • Ideal for rigid and dimensionally stable components
  • Proven standard material for housings, brackets and technical components
  • Good choice for applications requiring high stiffness
  • Established material for repeatable production applications
  • Widely used in industrial 3D printing

Frequently Asked Questions About PA11 and PA12 in 3D Printing

What Is the Difference Between PA11 and PA12 in 3D Printing?
+
Is PA11 or PA12 Better for Snap-Fit Connections?
+
Which Material Is Suitable for Functional Prototypes?
+
Are There Differences in the Printing Process?
+
How Do the Materials Differ in Long-Term Use?
+
Does Component Geometry Matter?
+
Is PA11 More Sustainable Than PA12?
+
Which Material Is Used More Frequently?
+

PA11 or PA12 – Find the Right Material

Upload your component and compare PA11 and PA12 directly in the configurator – tailored to requirements such as durability, flexibility and intended application.

Upload Your Part & Select a Material →

Are your 3D files ready?

Upload your 3D data and instantly compare suitable materials and manufacturing processes.


Do you have any questions?

We will be happy to advise you personally regarding your 3D project.